Tips for Providing Constructive Code Review Feedback

Code Review Feedback

Almost every single person in the software industry must have heard about code reviews and may be familiar with it. Even then the concept of reviewing codes is misinterpreted. People in this industry generally assume that performing tests must be sufficient to meet the requirements of the verification process, yet it is mostly ignored in the software development life cycle. Therefore, they tend to turn a blind eye to the code review process. However, ignoring the code review process may rebound and have major consequences in response. Code review is a favorable quality assurance practice that assures high-quality and sustainable code and extends knowledge across team members. However, with the value and usefulness of the code review feedback, the value, and benefits that the team receives from the code review will increase and decrease. 

As the software developer or a quality assurance team member, you are not just responsible to write codes instead the main purpose is to deliver quality solutions to complex problems. Is the code you’ve written is meeting the quality standards and doing its job well? When the software encounters an error, can it be handled normally? Is the software safe and has sufficient performance? All these questions can only be answered if you’re providing constructive code review feedback to the developers, for this purpose expert code review services are required if you want to achieve the desired outcomes of your software product. 

Here in this article, we are revealing some of the great tips for providing respectful and constructive code review feedback;

Cross questioning is always a nice approach - The nicest way to cultivate a positive feedback culture is to ask questions rather than ask for change. Asking questions about code has many advantages. It acts as a dialogue and emphasizes that neither the reviewer nor the code author is always correct.

Asking questions also reduce confrontation. This means that code authors and code reviewers can jointly determine the appropriate course of action. It also makes it possible for the developers to discuss wise choices and learn from each other's perspective.

Feedback must be about the code not about the author - Although it’s the responsibility of the reviewer to pinpoint the errors in the codes written yet they must be very careful while providing feedback. They must not blame an author and never hurt their feelings because blaming the person instead of code leads to justification, rejections, and offensive behavior.

Feedback in the form of opinion - Do not make someone feel hurt. Although you should not blame the person who wrote the code, it is a better option to use I messages to show that feedback comes from you. First and foremost, this shows that the feedback is not a general statement or summary, but your observation, opinion, or point of view.

Remember not to be sarcastic - It is easy to detect from the tone of a person either in verbal or written form. So better be concerned about it when you are providing feedback to the code authors, if they may detect sarcasm in your feedback, chances are they may get offended and the whole product and organization would have to suffer then. 

Avoid using Condescending words - One needs to be cognizant about the choice of words when it comes to providing feedback. Words such as "just", "simple", "only" or "obvious" may be understated and condescending. It is best to remove these words from the feedback. Most of the time, they do not add any value.

An explanation for the change in codes - If you recommend changing the code, you should also explain the reason for the proposed change. If you are 100% sure that the code author knows the reason, you don't have to do this. Nevertheless, most of the time adding short explanations is better than assuming that the code author knows your reasons.

Adding value to your code feedback - To understand how to add value, you must consider who to provide feedback to. Is this a good friend, a new employee, or someone from another team? How much guidance and explanation do they need?

In addition, think creatively. 

Conclusion

If you’re playing the role of a reviewer, then its a heavy responsibility on your shoulders. Be sure to provide feedback that is respectable, constructive, and an author’s feelings are not being attacked. Make sure you are using a soft and guiding tone instead of blaming words which may result in the offensive behavior of the authors. It is of great importance because code writers are an organization’s great asset.  

Similar Articles

Issue Tracking Tools

Issue tracking is one of the most important parts of a software development lifecycle that cannot be skipped or omitted. While organizations emphasize on increasing their software testing efforts to improve quality and ensure faster releases, their dependency on tools increases too.

UFT Test Automation Frameworks: What You Need to Know

As the importance of software continues to grow, there are several factors whose influence have grown right along with it. And out of all of them, test automation frameworks have garnered their fair share of attention from the market. Why is that?

Top Ways in Which EHR Systems Enable Better Patient Care

Electronic Health Records system offers benefits that have enabled an industry as tricky as healthcare. The software allows for medical professionals and other professionals across the ecosystem to quickly input as well as access information about a patient.

Why You Should Choose Angular to Build Web Apps

Development, while eventually rewarding, can be a very tedious process. But that’s the thing about technology; it always manages to find a solution, no matter the problem. So, in the context of development, experts came up with frameworks that would help programmers do away with tedious and arduous coding practices.

Issue Tracking System in DevOps

DevOps and Agile approach in an organization is not merely an implementation of certain tools and techniques, instead, it is cultural change. Many organizations in the software industry have either adopted these methodologies or are making accommodations to incorporate them in their system.

SharePoint for HR Management

Running a company, no matter how big or small is no easy task. It has so many different parts and components that all need to be managed correctly to ensure seamless operations for the company. Now, different people may have different opinions about how to ensure the smooth functioning of a business.

text editor

These days, collaboration has become a business need to support innovative ways of working. Companies are well beyond a realm where employees are destined to their counters. The staff is hardly in the same place at the same time

Blind Spots in Software Testing

Have you ever accidentally added spice to a cake, because you were baking a cake and a steak at the same time? Have you dumped a spoon in a dustbin instead of a washbasin?  

Online Exams: Best Practices to Ensure Security

Online exams may seem like a modern contraption and, quite frankly, they are indeed quite advanced. But what they are not is brand new — yep, the concept of online exams has been around for nearly as long as the concept of online learning has been around.