There’s this article about Professor Wynne Jones, of Harper Adams University College in Australia, urging young people to study science. Actually, this is not the main theme of the article: It’s about the controversy surrounding genetically modified (GM) foods, and how it can be solved through public education.

Jones sneaks in the idea of egging on young people to study science and technology so that that they can lead this campaign, a theory I’ve not heard since I started blogging about agricultural biotechnology. And I’ve not come across a study that shows young scientists can execute public awareness campaigns about agricultural biotechnology, or any other controversial scientific innovations, than their older counterparts.

In this article, Jones rightly argues the world would be a better place if more young people study science and technology. Apart from gaining scientific knowledge for their career and professional development, Jones further argues, these young scientists - as a service to the community - would be invaluable asset in educating the public about new scientific innovation.

Jones says the debate about genetically modified foods can greatly benefit from young scientists. They’ve the energy and tact to convince a wary public that modern agricultural biotechnology has great potential.

“It’s up to us as educationalists and scientists to inform the public and have a debate based on fact and not heated emotions,” Says Jones referring to the confusion surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
Jones can’t be further from right on this issue. More education and awareness about GMOs is needed.

As I’ve repeatedly argued on this blog, the public has been denied education about GMOs. And to blame for this situation are scientists who always shy away from confronting those who try to distort their work. As Jones puts it, it’s high time they fill up the plate.